Gay men frottage
Australian men’s sexual practices in saunas, sex clubs and other male sex on premises venues
A Australian Explore Centre in Sex, Health and Community, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin Avenue, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: a.lyons@latrobe.edu.au
Sexual Health 7(2) 186-192 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09101
Submitted: 15 September 2009 Accepted: 15 Rally 2010 Published: 14 May 2010
Abstract
Background: Sex on premises venues (SOPVs) where men own sex with men have been implicated in the spread of sexually transmissible infections, but rare studies have described men’s sexual encounters in SOPVs, particularly the degree to which men from different backgrounds occupy in risky sexual practices. Methods: Interviewer administered surveys were conducted with 186 Australian men who have sex with men (MSM) within 48 h of visiting an SOPV. They reported their sexual practices, the characteristics of their partners and other circumstances surrounding their sexual encounters.
I’m Tim, and I’m from Montclair, New Jersey.
I came out in three separate occasions over a summer. The first one was, “I think I might be gay.” And the second one was, “I’m gay.” And the third one was, “Yeah, no, I am. I really am gay and this is irreversible.”
I remember going through kind of a checklist of, okay, what does it mean to be a gay man and what are the things I want to abide by to not just convince my parents or my family or my people, but also to convince the world I am a valid gay man. This is who I am. That checklist, I know, included things like, you got to go clubbing, you got to go to the gay bars, ’cause that’s what you’re expected to do, and you have to start dressing a little bit better than you did. The third one was, you need to commence having sex like a same-sex attracted man, which I interpreted as you need to be into anal sex.
So when I was 18, 19, I had just finished school in Indiana. Then I went to study in London and I started exploring what it was to exist that checklist. What inspired me to go to London is, it’s kind of funny because I wasn’t really planning to do it. My s
frot
Also America is scared shit of NK and Iran and thinking of using nuclear weapons (The irony) successfully if they undertake I personnaly will be out standing in frot of Embassies and ASDA stores boycotting Americans goods forever
Think Progress » The horrors of Iraq. 2006
Gay men can, however, frot, which is apparently the male equivalent.
Everything2 New Writeups avalyn 2009
Well, two women can employ in scissoring, and two men can engage in frot, without penetration.
The Volokh Conspiracy » DADT Repeal Soon? 2010
Well, two women can engage in scissoring, and two men can engage in frot, without penetration.
The Volokh Conspiracy » DADT Repeal Soon? 2010
In some circles [insert joke here – Ed.], the slang terms “frot” and “scissoring” are used, respectively, to describe the male-homo and female-homo variants of the more general term frottage.
The Volokh Conspiracy » “Four Days That Shook DADT” 2010
In some circles insert joke here –Ed., the slang terms “frot” and “scissoring” are used, respectively, to describe the male-homo and female-homo variants of the more general term frottage.
The Volokh Conspiracy &raq
Critical Censorship of Gay Literature
Sodom: or, The Quintessence of Debauchery, attributed to that rakish libertine John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, and published in Antwerp in 1684, has the distinction of being the first literary work to be censored in England on the grounds of obscenity and pornography. It is appropriate that English-American anti-smut laws chose at their first victim a fine example of homosexual Restoration erotica, for homosexual literature has almost always been the single literary tradition to suffer the most at the repressive hands of censors and the no less repressive hands of scholars, critics, editors of so-called definitive anthologies and authors of so-called typical biographies, and of course teachers who would not touch such a tradition — if they even knew it existed.
Although the constitutionality of censorship laws is a never- ending debate, militant and aggressive sweeps under the carpet are no longer serious overt threats to the